This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug kprobes/3541] New: unsafe printk calls in hand-coded kprobe handlers


printk is supposed to be callable from anywhere, but various people have noted
that that's not really the case.  See, for example, bugs 1594, 1837, 1564, and
1776.  This bug report has a little more in the way of specifics on that topic.

In 1776, calling printk from a handler for a probe in activate_task yielded
oopses and/or hangs.  In that particular case, I think a deadlock is caused as
follows: activate_task -> handler -> printk -> release_console_sem [locks
logbuf_lock] -> up -> __up_wakeup -> __up -> wake_up -> __wake_up ->
__wake_up_common -> default_wake_function -> try_to_wake_up -> activate_task ->
handler -> printk [goes for logbuf_lock again].

This is not a problem for SystemTap, which doesn't emit printk calls, but it
could be for kprobes users.  Possible actions we could take include:

1) Document this type of scenario in Documentation/kprobes.txt.  I.e., a handler
for any function callable while logbuf_lock is held shouldn't call printk.

2) Push for an enhancement to printk.c -- e.g.,
a) In release_console_sem, consider releasing logbuf_lock and console_sem in
reverse order.  Unfortunately, while logbuf_lock is held there's also a call to
down_trylock, which can indirectly call wake_up_locked, so that doesn't buy us much.
b) Upon entry to printk, consider calling spin_trylock instead of spin_lock, and
print nothing (and maybe atomic_inc a miss-counter to report later) if we can't
get logbuf_lock.

-- 
           Summary: unsafe printk calls in hand-coded kprobe handlers
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: kprobes
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3541

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]