This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Need more information on uProbes .

From: Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
Cc: ananth at in dot ibm dot com, Diptopal Basu <diptopal dot basu at gmail dot com>, utrace-devel at redhat dot com, systemtap at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:05:41 -0700
Subject: Re: Need more information on uProbes .
References: <bd97640b0903310525h5144974fr6daaf32e82aeb38b@mail.gmail.com> <20090331130632.GA6358@in.ibm.com> <y0mzlf13ht5.fsf@ton.toronto.redhat.com>

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 10:09 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> ananth wrote:
> 
> > Uprobes is implemented only for architectures that have utrace support
> > (x86-32, x86_64, powerpc, s390, but not IA64). [...]
> 
> (HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK is on for ia64, sparc, sh also, so utrace per se
> should work there.)
> 

FWIW, Intel did an ia64 port of uprobes as well, but there wasn't
sufficient followup to get it tucked into systemtap/runtime/uprobes.

Jim

References:
- Need more information on uProbes .
  - From: Diptopal Basu
- Re: Need more information on uProbes .
  - From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
- Re: Need more information on uProbes .
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]