This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug runtime/9821] Support strftime like format for output file


------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com  2009-04-02 23:53 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=3865)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3865&action=view)
> [PATCH][BUGFIX] fix strftime formatting
> 
> The results of %C, %l and %j have not fitted the output of date command. This
> patch fixes this problem.

Why are we taking a subset of strftime and implementing it ourselves?  Couldn't
we just use the real strftime(3) and be done with it?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jistone at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9821

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]