This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [PATCH -tip tracing/kprobes 0/9] tracing/kprobes, perf: perf probe and kprobe-tracer bugfixes
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec at gmail dot com>
- To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at ghostprotocols dot net>
- Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte dot hu>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at redhat dot com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis dot org>, lkml <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix dot de>, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx dot de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba dot org>, Peter Zijlstra <a dot p dot zijlstra at chello dot nl>, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead dot org>, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth at in dot ibm dot com>, Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor dot com>, systemtap <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>, DLE <dle-develop at lists dot sourceforge dot net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:45:11 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip tracing/kprobes 0/9] tracing/kprobes, perf: perf probe and kprobe-tracer bugfixes
- References: <20091017000711.16556.69935.stgit@dhcp-100-2-132.bos.redhat.com> <20091017080203.GA4155@elte.hu> <20091017103427.GA31238@elte.hu> <4ADAAF50.9040604@redhat.com> <20091019075103.GF17960@elte.hu> <20091019110055.GA5549@nowhere> <20091019161824.GA10449@ghostprotocols.net>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:18:24PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:00:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 09:51:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > So, what would you think about using -D (def) and -U (undef) ?
> > > The simpest case should be no extra character at all:
> > > perf probe schedule
> > Yeah, I really prefer that too.
>
> /me too
>
> > If you want more precision, it also means you have you code editor opened
> > and want to set a precise point. Since you also have the absolute
> > line directly displayed by your editor, you don't want to calculate the relative
> > line but rather the absolute one.
>
> Perhaps this should come with vim/emacs key bindings so that all this
> gets hidden by just opening the source code and pressing
> control+SOMEKEY?
>
> - Arnaldo
Yep, would be a nice idea.