This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Integer constant is too large for 'long' type


Hi,

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:18:28PM +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
>
>
> OK, the above shows that the linker script that is creating your arm
> kernel images is putting the build-id note in a weird place - at the
> very beginning of RAM, far away from .text and friends. ?My guess is
> that this memory is actually not preserved at run time, so that even
> if we got the systemtap-time offsets all compiled in, the run-time
> value would not match.
OK.
>
> On more typical desktop linux builds, the build-id section is placed
> right after .text, so that relative to the _stext symbol, there is a
> smallish positive offset. ?And that way the buildid bits get
> preserved. ?Can you check whether this is fixable in the arm kernel
> you are using?

I'll check at my end with arm Kernel.

Thank you very much.

Best regards
Naresh Kamboju

>
> - FChE
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]