This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug testsuite/11525] pr10854.exp locks up expect run


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2010-04-22 13:15 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I haven't seen this problem, but I see problems when looking at pr10854.stp.  It
> > filters out probe hits from 'staprun' instead of 'stapio', and should probably
> > do that filter in the .return handler also.  Here's a patch of those changes:
> 
> Yes, nice catch.  Using "pid() == stp_pid()" might be even better.

I pushed this change since it cleans up the testcase.


commit 1aa71d93e247f68ef9222b01f386e1d21dd23b81
Author: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 22 15:07:49 2010 +0200

    Skip stapio tracing in pr10854.stp.
    
    As pointed out by dsmith and jistone in PR11525, this cleans up the test.
    
    * testsuite/systemtap.base/pr10854.stp: Use pid() == stp_pid()) next
      to skip tracing our own helper process.

But it doesn't help my case (and I would be surprised if it did).
Still stuck with the following while running pr10854.exp:

14760 pts/1    Tl+    0:00 expect -- /usr/share/dejagnu/runtest.exp --tool syste
15210 ?        Zs     0:00 [stapio] <defunct>

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11525

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]