This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug translator/11095] Support "provider" for mark() probes
- From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 31 May 2010 22:26:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug translator/11095] Support "provider" for mark() probes
- References: <20091216113154.11095.mjw@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-05-31 22:26 -------
I'm thinking of implementing this by prefixing the probe name as stored
in the .probes section data by the provider name and a "$" character.
The translator would then accept an optional probe point option to specify
the provider name, and expand it properly upon disassembly. (Without $
in the probe name, as in currently built executables, would mean a null
provider name.)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|systemtap at sources dot |fche at redhat dot com
|redhat dot com |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-31 22:26:21
date| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11095
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.