This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: uprobes and empty functions
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 14:46 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 01:14 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > Attached. I'm refusing to probe any of those "special" instructions if
> > they have a prefix, with the sole exception of "rep ret" because we can
> > make sense of that. (I only diffed uprobes2 this time, but of course
> > the others need the same fix...)
>
> Here's another iteration. This time I addressed the TODO that
> uprobe_post_ssout should use flags, which makes the code a bit nicer.
> Reviews welcome...
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
Thanks. The only problem I see is that if setup_uprobe_post_ssout()
rejects the instruction, you need to report that via printk().
Jim