This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug translator/12609] Cannot see variable values in partial inlined functions with gcc 4.6


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12609

--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> 2011-05-17 09:21:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Mark, is there reason to suspect systemtap here, or is this a pure gcc
> "guality" regression?

A quick looks shows gcc doing partial inlining of foo. Some of the variables
might indeed not be available in the partial inlined version of foo that stap
probes. So it might actually reflect reality in this case of where the probe
gets placed. I think I just filed the testcase to do a deeper analysis of what
is going on.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]