This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: improve build-id mismatch error reporting

Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@iki.fi> writes:

> [...]
> The code compares UTS_RELEASE first and only then looks at
> UTS_VERSION. Do you still think it makes sense to print UTS_RELEASE in
> the UTS_VERSION mismatch case? (as in that case UTS_RELEASE matched
> correctly).

Yes, probably, to give user more hints.


> Autoconf test won't work since kernel versions can change after
> systemtap has been built?
> I looked around a bit but I'm not quite sure how to test this runtime.

Aha, but we have a run-time autoconf scheme (cribbed originally from
some vmware makefiles).  See buildrun.cxx, runtime/autoconf-*.

- FChE
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]