This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Xconq project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Is acp-min useful?


On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Stan Shebs wrote:

> Keir Novik wrote:
> 
> > (ii) A unit is attacked by several enemy units, but can only defend
> > against a limited number of attacks in a given turn.
> 
> That's what happens now by default, right?  Or are you saying that you'd
> like the opposite - units can defend against all attacks, but that if
> there too many, acp will go negative and require the unit to rest on the
> spot. 

I was thinking that a unit with free-acp > acp-to-defend would be able to
defend an unlimited amount of times, as an argument against free-acp.

-- 
Keir Novik                               E-mail: K.E.Novik@qmw.ac.uk
Computing Officer                         Phone: +44 (0)20 7882-7759   
Centre for Computational Science            Fax: +44 (0)20 7882-7794   
Department of Chemistry
Queen Mary & Westfield College (University of London)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]