This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Is acp-min useful?
- To: Xconq 7 Mailing List <xconq7 at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Is acp-min useful?
- From: Keir Novik <K dot E dot Novik at qmw dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 15:12:14 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Stan Shebs wrote:
> Keir Novik wrote:
>
> > (ii) A unit is attacked by several enemy units, but can only defend
> > against a limited number of attacks in a given turn.
>
> That's what happens now by default, right? Or are you saying that you'd
> like the opposite - units can defend against all attacks, but that if
> there too many, acp will go negative and require the unit to rest on the
> spot.
I was thinking that a unit with free-acp > acp-to-defend would be able to
defend an unlimited amount of times, as an argument against free-acp.
--
Keir Novik E-mail: K.E.Novik@qmw.ac.uk
Computing Officer Phone: +44 (0)20 7882-7759
Centre for Computational Science Fax: +44 (0)20 7882-7794
Department of Chemistry
Queen Mary & Westfield College (University of London)