This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Uses for change-type action?
- To: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: Uses for change-type action?
- From: Emmanuel dot Fritsch at ign dot fr (Emmanuel Fritsch)
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:47:58 +0200
# Well, thinking abstractly, what about units that have essentially the same
# composition, but react or perform differently? E.g., an infantry unit
# that can change to "dug-in infantry" type, and back again? The movement
# and combat capabilities would be different for each type. I could also
# imagine "infantry mounted in halftracks" <--> "infantry with accompanying
# halftracks", "fighters in an interceptor role" <--> "fighters in an escort
# role", etc.
All this could be lead though garrisonning, no ?
In fact, I do not understand the specific power of
change-type action compared to build/garrisoning.
Could you explain ?
a+
manu