This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Compiling /running Xconq in Cygwin environment
- From: "Stanley Sutton" <sutton at earthdecision dot com>
- Cc: <xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:32:15 -0500
- Subject: Compiling /running Xconq in Cygwin environment
I finally modified the aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in files to compile
properly under Cygwin and Solaris Forte 6 C, but I'm getting the
following error under Cygwin:
$ Error: Error reading tcl from
/usr/local/share/xconq/lib/../tcltk/tkconq.tcl: couldn't r
ead file "/usr/local/share/xconq/lib/../tcltk/tkconq.tcl": no such file
or directory.
However, listing the directory/file I get:
$ lsf /usr/local/share/xconq/tcltk
BWidget/ imfapp.tcl tkconq.tcl
Any ideas? Oh, by the way, how do you compile the win version? And do
I have to put the tcl/tk subdirectories in for Cygwin? I still plan to
try to compile the the ActiveTCL files under Cygwin to see if they will
work.
Stanley M. Sutton sutton@t-surf.com
AIM: StanleyMSutton Ext: 113
MSNMessenger: sutton@t-surf.com Yahoo: stanley_sutton
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Kingdon [mailto:kingdon@panix.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:24 AM
> To: hronne@telia.com
> Cc: Stanley Sutton; xconq7@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: orange
>
> > Didn't occur to me that this would be a problem since Xconq (or
rather
> > tcltk) does not honour the system colors for me. Rather, it always
> > uses a dreary black on gray.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "system colors", but in the case of X
> resources, you probably don't have any set, which leaves it up to the
> application. At least, that is the usual default.
>
> > But as Jim says, you can pick your own favourite colors now by a
> > simple hack at the start of tkconq.tcl. Ultimately, this will be
> > settable through the user interface.
>
> The question is whether to have only an xconq-specific user interface
> or whether xconq should honor the user interfaces which work across
> applications. The latter is easier said than done because there are
> so many different flavours: X resources, GNOME, KDE, Mac (I assume),
> Windows (I suppose).