This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: update material display

From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
To: pgarrone at acay dot com dot au
Cc: hronne at comhem dot se, xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: update material display
References: <l03130303bba8911e4e57@[212.181.162.155]> <l03130302bba6c7f541e9@[212.181.162.155]> <20031006044553.GA7895@leonardo> <l03130302bba6c7f541e9@[212.181.162.155]> <l03130303bba8911e4e57@[212.181.162.155]> <l03130300bbacc6938404@[212.181.162.155]> <20031013114903.GB725@leonardo>

> But is it not a game convention that a unit with a storage capacity
> of 9999 has infinite capacity for that material?

No.  It has a capacity of 9999.  Whether that is "infinite" in
practice depends on the game.

> I would agree that testing for 99 and 999 as well as 9999 is a bit tacky.

All 3 are tacky.  If we want to be able to say infinite, we should
have a syntax like "infinity" or perhaps -1.

References:
- Re: update material display
  - From: Hans Ronne
- Re: update material display
  - From: Hans Ronne
- update material display
  - From: Peter Garrone
- Re: update material display
  - From: Peter Garrone

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]