This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Standing Orders

From: Hans Ronne <hronne at comhem dot se>
To: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:06:25 +0100
Subject: Re: Standing Orders
References: <3FB51778.C3690FAC@durham.ac.uk> (message from Alan Kenwrighton Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:57:12 +0000)<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311132151270.25541-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu><200311141532.hAEFWUS12870@panix5.panix.com><3FB51778.C3690FAC@durham.ac.uk>

>xconq isn't really a framework which is general enough to implement a
>game like that.  There are plenty of details (non-hexagonal map ...

Non-hexagonal maps would be easy to implement if we had a more useful
country/province concept. One would just set movement costs within the
province to zero, and get a Risk-type game. Right now, you can define
provinces as features, but they just serve as decorations. They don't mean
anything to the kernel.

Hans

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standing Orders
  - From: Eric McDonald

References:
- Re: Standing Orders
  - From: Alan Kenwright
- Re: Major improvement to the Xconq kernel
  - From: Eric McDonald
- Re: Major improvement to the Xconq kernel
  - From: Jim Kingdon
- Re: Standing Orders
  - From: Jim Kingdon

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]