This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Strategic Range in Xconq
- From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>
- To: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: pzgndr at hotmail dot com, <xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:16:54 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Strategic Range in Xconq
Hello Elijah, Bill,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Elijah Meeks wrote:
> I think this is the biggest feature for future
> versions of xconq, because it really is just a
> tactical simulator until we get some kind of working
> diplomatic/political model.
Acutally, there is disabled support in the existing Xconq kernel
for what are known as "side agreements". My understanding is that
it was commented and #if 0'd out because it didn't work right. So,
"implementing" this feature might involve fixing the existing one.
>This means, of course,
> getting the AI to work it right, and it's likely a
> Herculean task,
Possibly.
Eric