This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: does the tutorial lie?
- From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>
- To: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
- Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: does the tutorial lie?
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Jim Kingdon wrote:
> I suppose some kind of disclaimer would be OK, although of course it
> might just lead to general doubt and uncertainty rather than critical
> reading.
That is why I posed it as a question rather than a possible
solution. ;-)
> I'd like to see us do at least *something* about inaccuracies as we
> notice them.
I absolutely agree. Presently, I am running a bit behind because
of other obligations and things that I considered to be higher
priority wrt Xconq. But, in the past, I think you know that I
generally patch the docs as I encounter the flaws....
There was a missing 'create-range' entry reported several weeks
ago, IIRC, and I still I haven't looked into that one. I don't
think a patch was supplied for it.
Eric