This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Weird fuel behavior


Hans Ronne wrote:

I like the idea of panes on the side, as opposed to the bottom or top.
Makes the aspect ratio of the main map closer to that of a square.
Question is, are sides the most comfortable for the human eye?


I doubt that. It was pointed out a long time ago that most computer games
have this stuff in arow at the bottom, just where the instrument panel in a
car is located, and probably for the same reason.

Like the fact that the firewall separating the cockpit from the engine compartment is located there (in most cars)? ;-) Why put the dash board near the roof of the car or off to the side, if the bottom is already blocked? I think that could simply be a matter of not wasting viewable area.


I don't think most users
would prefer a square map window, but rather a wider "panoramic" view.

All those houses with square windows....


This
is after all what we are used to since we live on a surface (the Earth) so
the human brain is probably hard-wired to like it.

The reason why I posed the question is because a similar evolutionary conjecture had crossed my mind as well. However, I was hoping that someone would chime in with an ergonomic or interface design study that would more strongly suggest a resolution to the wide rectangle vs. square question.


Eric


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]