This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Major bug and what to do about it (long)
- From: Hans Ronne <hronne at comhem dot se>
- To: Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>
- Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:24:17 +0200
- Subject: Re: Major bug and what to do about it (long)
- References: <l0313030abd4789d945b2@[212.181.162.155]>
>> The probability of hitting an unseen unit should not be affected by the
>> fact that you think you are shooting at something which is not there.
>
>Why? Surely if you were firing at an individual unit, then the
>chance of another just happening to be in its place coupled with
>the chance of hitting the substitute unit should be smaller than
>the hit chance of directly aiming at the substitute unit.
Not at all. I am talking about a fire-into substitute action here, not a
fire-at action against the unseen unit (which would be impossible by
definition). So the hit chance should really be the same regardless of
where the unit is located in the cell.
Hans