This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: New Home for Xconq Project?
Hi Coop,
D. Cooper Stevenson wrote:
What would happen if we went to SourceForge or Savannah for "eyballs" and
pointed to the Xconq.org or RedHat site for a CVS backup?
I think that, in the case of Sourceforge, it would fit closer to their
[Sourceforge's] philosophy if we, at least, made files available for
download on their mirrors (via their File Release System). As far as CVS
goes, I don't know. I think we should try their CVS server first. If it
doesn't prove reliable, then we can use a CVS server elsewhere
(xconq.org, perhaps).
It's trivial for me to mirror the xconq.org server with the source
repository's server.
As long as it isn't against their policy and doesn't hog too much
bandwidth, I think it would be good to have a CVS mirror. When we get to
that point, I would say to go for it.
Obviously, this isn't an "automatic failover" solution but would it provide a
good compromise?
Well, this gives redundancy from an end user standpoint. As a developer,
if the main repository is inaccessible, then I am still stuck with
waiting for it to come back before I can commit changes. Any changes
committed to a "mirror repository" would have to be
synchronized/committed to the main server later. Even if such a thing is
a current technical possibility, it would seem that information
pertaining to the original committer, original commit date, original
commit messages, etc... would be lost.
Regards,
Eric