This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSL/XSLT components on Wintel
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: XSL/XSLT components on Wintel
- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh at microsoft dot com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:28:32 -0800
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
The MSXML web releases at http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml may warrant an
investigation, if you haven't already eliminated them. The XML parser has
been rated well. There are still a handful of XSLT features missing (some
of which may induce pain). MSXML relies on URLMON and other internet
components, and thus requires a post-IE3 system update.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MarkH@i2.co.uk [mailto:MarkH@i2.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 1:15 AM
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: XSL/XSLT components on Wintel
>
>
> Can anyone recommend a reasonably up-to-date (W3C XML 1.0 rec
> and XSLT 1.0
> rec) COM or C++ based solution for application development on
> Windows 32 bit
> platforms? Please don't tell me about Java based stuff!
>
> I have looked at a lot of potential solutions. The most
> promising are listed
> below, but are either out of date in their W3C
> implementations or broken.
>
> CUEsoft: CUEXml 2.0 and CUEXsl 1.0 (XSL support is W3C 12/98 draft)
> Apache: Xalan-C 0.0.19 (binaries crash and problems building source)
>
> Any other alternatives would be appreciated, and if you have
> experience of
> them please let us know what you think of their features, useability,
> support, price etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark Hughes
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list