This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5
- From: Dan Morrison <dman at es dot co dot nz>
- Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 01:22:28 +1200
- Organization: Disorganised
- References: <93CB64052F94D211BC5D0010A800133101FDEBCC@wwmess3.bra01.icl.co.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Kay Michael wrote:
>
> > ok...one more dumb question guys...when we say
...
> URIs used to identify namespaces are never "fetched", they are just strings.
This whole thread is interesting.
So although it LOOKS like a URI, it's all bogus.
That string might as well say "XSLT 1.0"
I chose to believe that there was some meta-language available at that
source which could tell what to do with the syntax handed it.
Thinking about that, it's obviously too much to ask, but I was comparing
it with, say, an online DTD, which does behave that way.
Does the group think this is actually the way things will move, or was
this 'URI as a syntax definition' just a quick hack?
.dan.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list