RE: Is it time for an XSLT-list?

["Pawson, David" <DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk>]

Mike Kay: 
>
>I wonder if it's time for those of us who aren't interested in 
>IE5 1998 XSL
>to take ourselves off to a new XSLT-list, where hopefully 
>these people won't
>find us?
>
>I don't particularly want to acknowledge that "XSL" now means the old
>Microsoft dialect of XSLT-as-it-was, but it's beginning to 
>look as if that's
>becoming the de facto situation.

But Microsoft do have a mailing list for their product don't they?
Perhaps thats where the MS users should be asking their questions?

How come Mulberrytech is easier to find than the MS list?
Perhaps the intro to the Rec which (IIRC) mentions the list?
<quote>Comments on this specification may be sent to xsl-editors@w3.org;
archives of the comments are available. Public discussion of XSL, including
XSL Transformations, takes place on the XSL-List mailing list.</quote>



Regards, DaveP


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list