This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: referring to images in XSL FO
David Tolpin writes:
> > > If the url argument is not taken within url(...) it is not possible to parse
> > > shorthands.
> > >
> >
> > speaking for PassiveTeX, I have no intention, ever, ever, of supporting
> > shorthands......
>
> Do you have no intention to support them because it is the wrong
> way? Or they are difficult to implement? Or one can go pretty happy
> without them?
all of the above. I think they are evil, hard to
implement for me, and unnecessary. the bottom line is, who writes .fo
files? human fingers or computers? do computers need shorthands?
sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list