This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSL-List admin query
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: XSL-List admin query
- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh at microsoft dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:30:08 -0700
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
In Microsoft Outlook 2000 I use the following rules:
Move messages sent to xsl-list@mulberrytech.com to folder xsl-list.
Move messages sent to xsl-list-digest@mulberrytech.com to folder xsl-list.
I also have a rule which brings messages containing keywords such as
Microsoft and MSXML to my attention. This has been quite effective for me.
- Jonathan Marsh
Microsoft
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MarkH@i2.co.uk [mailto:MarkH@i2.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 3:14 AM
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: RE: XSL-List admin query
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: XSL-List Owner [SMTP:xsl-list-owner@mulberrytech.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 4:43 PM
>
> At 7 Apr 2000 09:26 +0100, MarkH@i2.co.uk wrote:
> > i have a problem setting rules to detect and file
> these messages
> away from
> > my inbox. most messages have a trailer " XSL-List info and
> archive:
> > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list" which i
> can match on,
> but some
> > don't.
> [bulk deleted - extracts below]
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tony Graham
> --
>
> Hi Tony
>
> > All XSL-List messages have the same footer.
> If only this were true I'd have no problem. Most do have the standard
> footer, but some don't. See below for an example from the
> archive which you
> can check yourself.
>
> > Match on the "sender" field
> Microsoft Outlook (yes some people have to use Microsoft
> software!) does not
> allow matching on "sender" (or "reply to" etc.). Only
> From/To/Subject/Body
> sections. Matching on "To" is no good because people use aliases (and
> Outlook doesn't see beyond these to the address). I tried
> matching on the
> footer, but as I said, some messages don't have the standard footer.
>
> Its an irritation rather than a big deal so if nothing can be
> done i'll shut
> up about it!
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
> --
> Example email which lacks the standard footer (taken from the
> archive):
>
> XSL-List Archive
> last() function
> From: "Richard Bell" <RichardBell@rogge.co.uk>
> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:06:52 +0100
> Organization: Rogge Global Partners PLC
>
> Using SAXON I statements like
>
> <xsl:if test="position()=last()"/>
>
> seem to work OK. However, when I parse using MSXML3 I get an error
>
> 'Last() function must have a node-set to operate on.
> position()=-->last<--()'
>
> Any thoughts. Thanks.
> Rich.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> ----
>
> Follow-Ups:
> [rest of sample email deleted]
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list