This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT Processor Performance
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: XSLT Processor Performance
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:51:07 +0100 (BST)
- References: <OFB2FE092C.3AB01F33-ON852568DA.0007B366@lotus.com> <14623.60283.714471.427231@spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
For a quick amusement, consider these first lines:
==> x-oraxsl.test <==
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
==> x-saxon.test <==
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
They're equivalent (encoding is not case sensitive)
==> x-xalan.test <==
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
and tell me what I should think.
XSLT spec (16.1) says:
If no encoding attribute is specified, then the XSLT processor should
use either UTF-8 or UTF-16.
> [2] file:/tmp/test/typeset.xsl:19: no such function: key
Yes please (a key enabled version of xt would be nice.....)
David
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list