This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: feature request
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: feature request
- From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:33:19 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> > So this is the way of the future for XSLT?
> >
> > If you can't support something in a way that
> > works (entities), attempt to
> > convince people that they shouldn't even want
> > them in the first place ... ?
>
>I don't think its fair to blame XSL for all this. It is going with the
>flow of things like SAX and DOM, which do not provide access to
>entities. For XSLT to do otherwise would be to place a much bigger
>burden on the implementors.
Summary then?
I continue to use the kludge to get what I need?
No response from the editors?
Regards, DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list