This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Which is correct, xt or SAXON?

To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: Which is correct, xt or SAXON?
From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv at dyomedea dot com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 20:16:51 +0200
References: <000501bfbf55$38054ca0$3d00a8c0@hisl.co.uk> <200005161702.SAA21970@nag.co.uk>
Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com

David Carlisle wrote:

> you can't have a < in an attribute value in XML.

Right, but here James Petry is using the HTML output method.

I don't know if it's correct, but this has been done on purpose, James
Clark has removed the test to translate "<" and ">" by their entities
values in the latest release of XT (the previous one would have given
"&lt;&gt;").
 
Eric
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which is correct, xt or SAXON?
  - From: Eric van der Vlist

References:
- Which is correct, xt or SAXON?
  - From: James Petry
- Re: Which is correct, xt or SAXON?
  - From: David Carlisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]