This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSL Performance
- To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: XSL Performance
- From: "Kevin Galligan" <kevin at ospreypartners dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:25:51 -0400
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
There hasn't really been an answer to this question yet. I was really
wondering myself this same question. There was a response that pointed to a
page with some xsl examples, but it really didn't answer the question
(although examples of good xsl, or anything new, are always useful).
-Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Khalid Asad
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 7:15 AM
To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: XSL Performance
Good question. I'd like to see an answer to this too.
Khalid
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Cormier" <merex@home.com>
To: <xsl-list@mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 12:57 PM
Subject: XSL Performance
> Are the any sites that discuss XSL's performance as it pertains to the XSL
> code. I am not looking for specific engine metrics, but for a discussion
> on what constitutes slow XSL.
>
> Thanks,
> Ross Cormier
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list