This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Underlined Text
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Underlined Text
- From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA at stibo dot dk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:51:11 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> Java doesn't really cut it on high volume sites, I'm
> converting one right
> now from Java based servlets/XSLT to a C implementation.
> Performance is 6x
> faster.
This is a lot. Could you please elaborate a bit on what exactly the differences between the two setups are?
Does the C version use a "streaming" form of XSLT where the input tree does not have to be completely built before output begins? Do you use a completely different approach? Does the Java engine have the necessary ressources to work -- i.e. enough memory, etc.
Is performance drowning on being flattened to a textfile piped servlets?
I have found the performance of Cocoon very sensitive to the underlying machine and it's configuration. It might be a similar issue for you.
Best regards,
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "... plus ... Tubular Bells!"
Stibo lokalnr 1212
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list