Re: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?

[David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>]

> A good point, but in the context of documentation generation the
> author has control over the parser and processor, so this isn't
> a problem. I don't think the idea is to give the stylesheet to
> someone, and tell them to extract the documentation, apply this
> other stylesheet. In the absence of widespread support for extension
> elements and fallback elements, as David C has proposed, my solution
> still seems quite attractive, albeit amoral.

And of course whichever documentation markup method you use, it's good to
see that the "auto document" feature of this list seems to have been
re-enabled. For newcomers, this was a feature where I (or I suppose
anyone) would post half working, undocumented code to the list and it
would magically be reposted with corrections and documentation added.

The auto-documenting service seems to have moved from Canada to
Nottingham but otherwise works in the same way as before:-)

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list