This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons
----- Original Message -----
From: Sebastian Rahtz
> Paul Tchistopolskii writes:
> > When I was experimenting with different XSLT engines,
> > I found that only XT survived processing of large documents,
> > all other engines fail to scale - the result usually was the
> > "blow up" described above.
>
> I would have agreed, until the 5.3 generation of Saxon. Have you been
> able to push that over yet? I have not.
No I have not. I'm almost sure that SAXON 5.3 scales better than the
version of SAXON which I was testing long time ago ( because
SAXON 5.3 was a major rewrite ).
Those who want to test it in the way I did, it appears that
egroups still contains some variant of benchmark I have been
using.
http://www.egroups.com/message/xml-server/203?&start=200
Rgds.Paul.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list