This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Saxon VS XT
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Saxon VS XT
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:11:06 +0100 (BST)
- References: <8C4E5E78C80BD311868F0000F6CBE724C5F0AD@IMSUSPLYCX4>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Jobin, Eric writes:
> I've been having an arguments with a co-workers about Saxon versus XT. He
> believes that XT should be "THE" tool while I argue that Saxon has all the
> power and flexibility. What do you think?
There is no contest, unless/until XT either gets completed by James,
or someone else takes the code and releases a complete (eg)
openXT. How can you live with a processor which does not implement the
whole spec?
Sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list