This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Antwort: comments. (Re: key() Re: Saxon VS XT)





Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com> am 08.08.2000 15:46:43

> > > I think it is very bad approach to 'solve' the readability problem
> > > with writing the comments.  Code should be self-documenting.
> >
> > Well. I supose you can understand "how" but I bet you cannot
> > find the answers on the questions "why?" and "for which purpose?"
>
> As I told, M'r Kernighan's book explains 'why'.

For _all_ problem domains? Then it is really a Bible. :-)))

> Page 27. "Students are taught that it's important to write comments.
> Professional programmers are often requierd to comment their code"

"If it was difficult to programm, it should be deificult to understand."

Regards!

Vit

PS: It seems an extern documentation with links to templates within xsl file can
be a solution.




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]