This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: New document: Requirements for XSLT 1.1
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: New document: Requirements for XSLT 1.1
- From: James Clark <jjc at jclark dot com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:11:41 +0700
- References: <44F0B703A897D311B4410008C7DF7068A1A2C6@exchange.stibo.dk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
>
> > I think that the greatest part of this document is that
> > "Language bindings
> > MUST be provided for Java and ECMAScript". It's a shame that
> > script didn't
> > make it into 1.0. I hope that implementors don't think that
> > they can only
> > provide say Java and forget scripting.
> > My 2p worth.
>
> My opinion is that this requirement is too strict, since it basically will kill all non-Java based implementations.
You're misunderstanding the wording. It's saying that the XSLT 1.1 spec
must define bindings for both Java and ECMAScript, not that XSLT 1.1
implementations must support both Java and ECMAScript.
James
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list