This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: XSLT and parallel processing


For a web portal, I use pools of XT processors and Sun's parsers, each
instance running in a separate thread.
The most significant optimization has been achieved by subclassing
com.jclark.xsl.dom.XSLTransformEngine from XT to take benefit of a cache in
the getDocument() method.

I also interested in getting a parallized version of XT if someone has
worked on such a task :-)

Tangi Vass

----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Ray <eray@oreilly.com>
To: <xsl-list@mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 9:17 PM
Subject: XSLT and parallel processing


> The subtree processing model of XSLT seems to make it a good
> application for parallel processing (i.e. using multiple CPUs to
> process different subtrees simultaneously).  Since many people have
> remarked on the inherent slowness of XSLT processors, I wonder if
> anyone has succeeded in creating an XSLT processor that successfully
> divides the work among different processors, resulting in a gain of
> processing speed.  Has anyone tried this?  Some of the implementations
> are written in Java, such as XT.  Do they use multi-threading and can
> they take advantage of multiple CPUs?
>
>
> --
> Erik Ray
> O'Reilly and Associates
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]