This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
- From: Mike Brown <mike at skew dot org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 11:07:31 -0600 (MDT)
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> > Better yet, how do you define 'portable'?
>
> Mike, I already confessed that I give up.
> [snip]
> ( and I see that you really understand this magic, when I don't ).
> [snip]
> Again - I think you do understand situation really much better than I
> do. Because, for example, I'll never push myself learning all the
> "portability" magic you have learned.
Your sarcasm is misdirected. This is a good discussion raising issues for
the benefit of all -- especially the XSL WG -- to understand that, as
you've been saying, the meaning and implications of version="foo" in the
stylesheet are far from clear, given the behavioural differences between
processors, in practice.
> I say ( to myself ) : "this is a hell of #ifdefs
I agree.
- Mike
____________________________________________________________________
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list