This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Thank you Tony (was: XSL-list doomed)
From: G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
> Again I think you are being far too unfair, Paul.
How can I be 'fair' or 'unfair' with technical issues ?
The archive of XSL-list is broken since summer
and nobody bothers to fix it. Is it 'fair' or 'not fair' -
I don't understand. It is the *fact*.
List loops starting from October 24. It is the *fact*.
The letter I was quoting has been sent to the
list at October 24 and since then I saw this
leter at least 3 times ( I prefere not to
see it at all ;-)
I'm not saying is Tony 'bad' or 'good'. If he has no
time / abilities to fix the archive in 2 months, this
means archive will remain broken forever.
I want XSL-list archive accessible from the
browser. If official XSL-list archive is gone,
I can try to provide the alternative XSL-list
website. For free and on my own time.
I just don't want to mess with usual political
problems this may cause. So I'm trying to
understand what is the situation with XSL-list.
Maybe Tony will write : "I'm tired of this and I
have no time - let's move it to egroups" ?
I'm not discussing any moral issues. Plain
technical.
Rgds.Paul.
> At 00/10/28 23:56 -0400, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> >It was not my idea to bring down the XSL-list,
> >but this have happened. List loops and loops
> >since October 24.
>
> Wrong ... Tony (the moderator) reports the loop only started happening on
> the morning of yesterday (Saturday) and Tony has spent time on his weekend
> to fix it for us.
>
> >XSL-list archive is also broken since the
> >summer ( and nobody bothers to fix it ).
>
> This is a thankless attitude ... Tony works hard on this list and I very
> much appreciate his involvement. To complain that he hasn't taken time
> from his weekend to fix the problem is ungracious and unfair. He keeps on
> top of the problems and is quick to respond when they happen.
>
> >If nobody cares about supporting XSL
> >mailing list, maybe placing the list on
> >e-groups is not a bad idea ?
> >
> >Or maybe I'm missing something
> >and XML community gets some special
> >joy with broken XML-list, broken XSL-list
> >e t.c. ?
> >
> >Rgds.Paul.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
> >To: <xsl-list@mulberrytech.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 9:55 AM
> >
> > > If XSLT is a solution - I want a problem back.
> > >
> > > So now it becomes too hard to dig into answer to *trivial*
> > > question, like : what does version="1.0" mean ?
> > >
> > > Hell with this tool then.
>
> Or maybe, Paul, this list could do with less complaining such as quoted
> from you above. It seems to me your negative attitude is not echoed by any
> other participant and I get this impression because I hear your negative
> attitude very often about many things.
>
> I very much applaud Tony's efforts on this list and the DSSSL list, and his
> freely available resources, editing environments, quick reference sheets,
> etc. etc. etc. Thank you Tony for your work and for helping to fix things
> during the weekend. Your valuable contributions to this community are very
> much appreciated by some of us.
>
> .................. Ken
>
> --
> G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
> Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
> Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (Fax:-0995)
> Web site: XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML services, training, libraries, products.
> Book: Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN1-894049-05-5
> Article: What is XSLT? http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/08/holman
> Next public instructor-led training: 2000-11-06/07,2000-11-12,
> - 2000-12-03/04,2001-01-27,2000-03-26
>
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list