This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Use of default namespace declaration
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Use of default namespace declaration
- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa at microsoft dot com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:53:43 -0800
- Cc: "'sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk'" <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Hi Sebastian,
I think this was lax conformance on part of the earlier parser, and has
since been tightened. See
http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/NamespacesFAQ.htm#q7_2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Rahtz
> [mailto:sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Re: Use of default namespace declaration
>
>
> Dimitre Novatchev writes:
> > In case you use msxml.dll version 8.0.5226.0 (from W2K
> SP1), then
> > you'll get the error message "Use of default namespace declaration
> > attribute in DTD not supported".
> >
> > In case you use an earlier msxml.dll (has version
> 5.0.2920.0 and can be
> > found in the \i386 directory on the W2K Professional CD.)
> > then your xml file will be parsed, validated and displayed
> OK by MSXML.
>
> nice idea, but I can't dictate to my `readers' which version of a dll
> they have to use to view my files...
>
> that aside, the Microsoft new release of the XSLT engine does look
> pretty good.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list