This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Which XSL processor to use.?
- To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Which XSL processor to use.?
- From: "Kevin Jones" <kjouk at yahoo dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 11:07:01 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
For recent benchmarks try,
http://www.datapower.com/XSLTMark/
http://www.tfi-technology.com/xml/xslbench.html
Personal preferences,
Microsoft MSXML is quick and newly conformant
(http://www.microsoft.com/xml)
XT is quick but not fully conformant and limited support
(http://www.jclark.com)
Saxon is conformant and well supported on this list
(http://users.iclway.co.uk/mhkay/saxon)
Kev.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Nitin Dutt Mathur
> Sent: 08 November 2000 05:45
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Which XSL processor to use.?
>
>
> Hello Friends,
>
> I am new to the XSL world.
>
> We have a business product which currently uses servlets and a templates
> files for showing the output. Servlets detects the user agent (through a
> parameter) and depending on the user agent (palm,mobile etc) throws the
> output.
>
> Now we want to shift to XML and XSL approach. What could be the best XSL
> processor we can use. Processor may or may not be free, but it should have
> good performance result.
>
> Can I find some benchmarking information on the net for the various XSL
> processor present.
>
> Thanxs in advanced.
>
> Nitin
>
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list