This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: include text file
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: include text file
- From: DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 07:53:15 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Mike Brown
> Has anyone done this kind of thing with non-well-formed HTML?
> I mean, if
> even non-well-formed HTML can be parsed into a DOM, and a DOM
> can be used
> as input to an XSLT processor, it seems to follow that an extension
> function like foo:html-document() would be feasible as an
> analog to the
> explicitly XML-specific document() function. You wouldn't
> even need a DOM
> to do it. Having such an extension function would alleviate a
> very common
> source of frustration among people trying to generate composite HTML
> documents.
Which would increase the crap found on websites relative to XSLT produced
HTML today?
One of the advantages of producing html via XSLT is that its at least
well formed.
-1 for me on this one Mike.
Regards DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list