This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: xsl:key and document()
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:key and document()
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:50:08 GMT
- References: <55449838504DD411A7A300508BDC963F422076@SEAEXCH03>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> storing the base doc tree in a variable seems a bit hack-y and
> inefficient.
why should it be inefficient? (You are not storing the whole tree in the
variable, just the root node)
Getting back to that root node is a rather different problem from the
one that Jeni was refering to which is getting the URI of that node.
XSLT specifies that every node has a URI (even if it is somewhat
artificial for constructed documents) it just doesn't let you know what
that URI is.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list