This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:05:49 GMT
- References: <200102151501.IAA08270@localhost.localdomain>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Maybe one of this days you'll explain why this cannot be done with
> XSLT 1.0.
Maybe it could be with some extra agreed conventions external to XSL
(which is I think what you are arguing for) but the current situation in
XSLT 1.0 is th exsl:choose mess that I posted earlier. Where the
implementation of the extension function is in a different namespace for
each processor.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list