This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche dot ogbuji at fourthought dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:31:08 -0700
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
>
> > Maybe one of this days you'll explain why this cannot be done with
> > XSLT 1.0.
>
> Maybe it could be with some extra agreed conventions external to XSL
> (which is I think what you are arguing for) but the current situation in
> XSLT 1.0 is th exsl:choose mess that I posted earlier. Where the
> implementation of the extension function is in a different namespace for
> each processor.
The agreed-upon separate convention is a cleaner approach, and if it succeeds,
it will effect much better interop than xsl:script/my-fave-binding.
Doesn't this mean it should be given a try first?
--
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list