This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche dot ogbuji at fourthought dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:57:27 -0700
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> > Hmm. Let's see, on the side that insists on language-bound
> > xsl:script are
> > Michael Kay, Steve Muench and Scott Boag. All Java XSLT
> > implementors, I should add.
>
> And all getting frequent emails from users saying "why can't I write a Java
> extension that is portable between Xalan and Saxon and Oracle."
I understand this to be the case, but why do you need a heavyweight W3C
solution to this? Especially given that the result would disadvantage other
stylesheet implementors? Especially given that the result increases the
coupling between extensions and XSLT?
> > All, it seems, reluctant to
> > pursue standardizing extensions using the existing XSLT 1.0
> > facilities.
>
> Not in my case as an individual. Nor do I think the group as a whole has any
> reluctance to do this. It just didn't put it top of the list.
I'm glad to be corrected.
Time to start doing something about this.
--
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list