This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: xsl:include still a problem..

To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:include still a problem..
From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel dot Veillard at imag dot fr>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:48:44 +0100
References: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F4F024E@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk> <000401c097fa$1c66ef20$de373c3e@oemcomputer>
Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:23:23AM -0000, Michael Kay wrote:
> > What does 'including an absolute xml:base' look like please anyone?
> 
> >From the xml:base rec (PR 20 Dec 2000):
> 
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <doc xml:base="http://example.org/today/">
> ...
> </doc>

  Just for the reference:

    http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/

Note that:
  - XSLT-1.0 processors are not supposed to recognize xml:base
  - XSLT-1.1 processors are (or more precisely "will be") expected
    to recognize it

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

References:
- RE: xsl:include still a problem..
  - From: DPawson
- RE: xsl:include still a problem..
  - From: Michael Kay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]