This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call for comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call for comments
- From: Jeni Tennison <mail at jenitennison dot com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:11:45 +0000
- Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
- References: <86136618807.20010225080930@jenitennison.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Could someone forward this to Xalan-Dev and to anywhere else that you
think might be interested?
Thanks,
Jeni
----
> Hi,
>
> I've put together a draft document that summarises our recent
> discussions on user-defined extension functions written in XSLT at:
>
> http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/exsl.html
>
> Comments on it should be sent here, to XSL-List with [exsl] at the
> start of the subject line.
>
> The main part of the document specifies the extension elements and
> functions (viz exsl:function, exsl:return and exsl:node-set()) that
> we've been talking about. Several outstanding issues are highlighted,
> but comments on other areas are welcome. It would be particularly
> helpful to hear from implementers.
>
> Appendix B gives loads of use cases of functions that could be
> implemented under this scheme, many of them borrowed from Saxon, which
> demonstrate the strengths (and weaknesses) of the scheme described in
> the document. If you have more use cases, then please let us know
> about them and, preferably, their solution.
>
> I'm not sure how long would be an adequate review period - one week?
> two? longer? Maybe it's best to wait and see how much discussion there
> is.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list