XSLFO or XSL-FO (was Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?)

[Wendell Piez <wapiez at mulberrytech dot com>]

XSLFO vs. XSL-FO --

Is there any guidance from the WG or any other "authority" on this?

Cheers,
Wendell

At 11:21 AM 3/20/01, Tony wrote:
>Neither XSL-FO nor XSLFO are used in the XSL CR.  "xsl-fo" appears
>only as the first five characters of "xsl-following", "xsl-footnote",
>and "xsl-footnote-separator".  XSLFO doesn't appear at all.
>
>"XSL-FO" (and any variation on it that you've seen) is merely a term
>that has come into common use but that has no standing in the XSL CR.
> >From the point of view of the XSL CR, the formatting process is not a
>separable portion of XSL, so the CR never uses the term.
>
>Regards,
>
>Tony Graham

======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list