This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: recursions?
Hi Wendell,
> This would work, wouldn't it Jeni? It's kind of a refinement of the
> count(ancestor::*) technique.
Yep, good point :) (Although if you're doing deep nesting it's
probably slightly more efficient to pass down a parameter as you go
rather than iterate over all the ancestors of each node.)
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list