This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: SGML vs XML
- To: xml-dev at lists dot xml dot org
- Subject: [xsl] Re: SGML vs XML
- From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism at maden dot org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:58:32 -0700
- Cc: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Why did you cross-post this as separate messages?
At 00:38 28-06-2001, SwetaG@riskinc.com wrote:
> I have many times read when i am going through the XML tutorials that
>SGML is to complex to be to be implem,ented for the web senario but i have
>not found any page saying that ok XML is subset of SGML and these these are
>the features which are there in SGML but are been excluded from the XML for
>removing the complexity of the SGML.Can you please send me those features
>which are not beening included in XML which are there for SGML??
Faced with formal questions like this, it's best to read the spec. The XML
Recommendation references "Comparison of SGML and XML" by James Clark, at
<URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-sgml-xml-971215 >.
-Chris
--
Christopher R. Maden, XML Consultant
DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
<URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list